Dealing with a common assault case.

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

Hi Phillip , your evidence is of paramount importance.If your evidence is solid then you have time to create a private agreement with the people coming against you. This means you need to write an affidavit with exhibits for anything that needs evidence. Alongside this you create a Non Consent Conditional Acceptance process. If you want to know how that works the quickest way is to invest in Mark’s Non Consent to Lockdown package and if you use this as a template then you will have an excellent guide to show you how to do the process. Alongside this you need to look at webinars about court and start memorising some scripts to use in court. It is a lot of work however if you get started now, you will be much better prepared for what is coming.

[philip-wainwright]

Thanks for the heads up Morag. I have started the scripts, done them twice now, along with the timeline of events and so on. There is so much more to this as it is evident in the on body camera of one of the coppers that the hospital staff think I am a conspiracy theorist and am therefore troubled in mind and action. This, along with the interactions I have had with the police over covid issues that I am a targeted individual. The CCTV does not show me hitting the security guard as used as evidence and given the excessive force used by him he is far exceeding his job description. I need to subpoena the video from the other cameras as well as other hospital staff who were involved, especially the doctor who knew nothing about the drug he was forcing down my father’s throat. The thing is, will the court see this as being submissible or regard it all as ‘not facts in the case’?

I will follow up on your suggestions, thanks again.

Cheers

Philip

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

Hi Phillip In my opinion the court system will no doubt try to stop you in your tracks by making spurious claims. Here’s a Q and A I did with Mark after a court case I was involved with.

Court-Questions-for-Mark-for-Lynley-2.pdf 62 KB PDF - Click to view

Options

• Copy Download Link

[philip-wainwright]

Thanks again Morag. I had a quick look through it but will have a better look later. Problem for me is my brain doesn’t work the way the legal system as my intellect is more intuitive. I will have to try and be more critical and analytical in my thinking to get my head around this. Watching some of the videos now. I am not exactly sure what knowledge sessions you have referred to as titles don’t match exactly what you provided so it might take me a bit of time to find the right references. It will be a long boring road ahead methinks.

Cheers

Philip

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

Here’s one to get you started http://solutionsempowerment.org/webinar-court-role-play-how-to-competently-address-court-win-your-case-and-or-have-the-case-set-aside-sine-die-or-dismissed/

Webinar: Court Role Play (How to competently address Court & win your case and/or have the case set aside sine die or dismissed)

[philip-wainwright]

Hi Morag. Not sure if you can help me here, as you seem to the only one who seems to have a handle on things, but this might go an extra step. Most of what is on this site is working out how not to be trapped in this system, which shouldn’t exist anyway but is one of our realities, but how does one go about using it to try and achieve equity and justice. For example, in this case I would like to bring the hospital and its staff to account, as well as have it pointed out that things stated by the police were not valid or required a particular understanding that could only have been explained to them by someone in the know. For example one of the police officers stated when my younger brother asked to have dad released or that he could see him, that ‘wouldn’t be happening soon’ or similar (that actual words are recorded on his on-body camera. I asked the question of the other officer but got a totally different response. How do I bring the police and others to task by using their own system against them? Is this something perhaps Mark can help with as well? Cheers Philip

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

You deal with it first in the private by obtaining an equitable estoppel agreement and private default judgement through an affidavit and three step Notice process. Once you have obtained the agreement then you use that agreement in court or a private round table meeting to prove whatever the agreement is stating. You need to learn how to hold your position with your agreement in court or in the private meeting as the judge or people at the round table meeting could test you by ignoring everything. How you deal with that determines whether you win or not. Watch the relevant webinars to learn how to do these processes.

[philip-wainwright]

Hi Morag. Thank you for your reply but I am unable to implement your instructions because I find this website impossible to follow. There is no structure to the content just random references to a range of topics that seem to be repeated or glossed over or when one looks under what appear to be the right headings the content is not spelled out. It is just a bundle of thought bubbles rather than a specific guide to follow, step by step in linear order. Mark confuses the issue with what is probably good advice but just doesn’t seem to support any specific topic. I just don’t have the time to hunt through the various topics to find what you are suggesting. I am absolutely buggered with exhaustion and this website is not offering what I had hoped it would offer. I realise it says it is a self help resource but when it appears to be just a collection of ideas I might as well use Google and achieve the same result. If you can possibly be more specific, I would greatly appreciate the help. Cheers Philip

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

What specifically are you looking for?

[philip-wainwright]

Hi Morag. The entire content of your previous response. Where do I find anything to do with an estoppel? Where do I find anything to do with a private agreement? Where do I find anything about anything? There are no topic headings, no content listings, no processes of any kind other than what Mark verbalises in a video. I have no idea how to link all the various elements together as I have not had the level of experience he has, so trying to unravel his history, his mistakes, his successes, on top of understanding a legal system that shouldn’t exist anyway, is just confronting. I have no spare time at all as I care for both parents full time, as well as a multitude of other duties, as I suspect many others are doing too, but to have time to put into, first searching for something I have no idea what it looks like, nor how it works, and secondly putting it all into a form that will make sense at the end is just draining me of what energy I have left. Surely after all this time Mark, and others, have spent on this there should be more structure, particularly if he is charging for the service. I’m sorry it this sounds like a major complaint but as a teacher I expect to see structure in what is offered as a course of study. Perhaps I just got it wrong and my expectations were too high. Here’s an alternative. Are you available, or those like you who have the experience, as a paid support person to help me deal with this matter, to walk me though exactly what I need to do? I have tried legal advice, but no one wants to travel to Kununurra, and the starting price is $50,000. I can’t get legal aid because I’m not black. Our local legal firm is too busy. I am running out of options and time. If you can offer something please email at thewainwrights@aapt.net.au. Cheers Philip

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

Hi Phillip what I did when I wanted to learn the three step process was I completed the non consent to Vaccines two years ago and Non Consent to Lockdown at the beginning of 2021. When I was helping others with the non consent to Lockdown process at the beginning of this year I decided to complete the whole process again and this time I used two JPs instead of one and I fixed small errors that had been in my first process. I repeated it so that I could demonstrate that it was still possible to do it in 2022. In 2021 I tried it out on a problem I had using Mark’s Lockdown and Vaccine Non consent processes as templates. When I copied what he had done exactly but put in the details of the thing I was dealing with and I was successful in completing a private default judgement and an equitable estoppel agreement with the corporation I was dealing with. It is very hard to learn this stuff when you are in crisis but not impossible. What have you purchased so far and which webinars have you watched and what processes have you completed?

[philip-wainwright]

Hi Morag. I have only purchased the first module but have watch quite a number of the webinairs, but so far not too many have made much sense. As mentioned before I find this stuff unbearably mundane to the point of being anal. It might be how we are governed but it is only because of the state of mind of most humans. We, as a species, are in a twilight zone of basic survival intelligence and that of deductive intelligence (ie the scientific method). These are both lower mental states and it will be sometime before the bulk of us will attain the higher state of intuitive intelligence, or more correctly, intellect. Unfortunately for those pushing this materialistic dogma down everyone’s throats is that most of us are due for destruction in the next cataclysm in the next dozen or so centuries so it is all for no gain spiritually. Ah well just have to keep reminding myself it has a purpose in our spiritual development. Thanks for your efforts though, much appreciated. Cheers Philip

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

The very first thing you have to do is collate all of your evidence. Evidence needs to be verifiable facts. You then create an affidavit and there is a module 49 showing you haw to complete affidavits. The affidavit establishes the evidence and if you make any statements in it that need proof then you attach the proofs as exhibits. Once you have completed the affidavit then you need to write your notices. This can be a Notice of Non Consent and Conditional Acceptance as a first Notice in the three step Notice process. You send this with the Affidavit to whoever is making a claim against you. You cna then go to court and ask for an adjournment. Holding your position in module 9 and module 14. Module 25 has the Formal Complaints process. Here are some resources to get you started.

Case-law-on-informed-consent-1.pdf 43 KB PDF - Click to view

Options

• Copy Download Link

Case-law-on-right-to-refuse-treatment-1.pdf 80 KB PDF - Click to view

Options

• Copy Download Link

Case-law-on-Medical-treatment-1.pdf 81 KB PDF - Click to view

Options

• Copy Download Link

[philip-wainwright]

Thanks for these too. Have downloaded them to look at later. Cheers Philip

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

I also transcribed the Webinar on addressing a Summons. Please let me know when you have this so I can delete it.

[philip-wainwright]

I have downloaded the doc thanks Morag so you can now delete it. Thank you for putting this up for me. I am not sure how it will help at first reading as it too has very little structure for the uninitiated. I will try and make sense of it, but it goes against my intuitive nature and that makes it difficult to absorb. It’s a right brain thing. Cheers Philip

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

Hi Phillip just one more thing, the place I started at when I first joinder Solutionsempowerment was to watch this webinar….http://solutionsempowerment.org/webinar-how-to-address-police-when-affronted-by-an-officer/ This immediately gave me something fairly easy to understand that I could get my head around and then I started to understand how contracts worked and why everything these businesses/corporations/government entities say to us is only an offer and it is how we respond to that offer that determines whether at the end of the day if we have any obligations to them in the form of eg doing what they want us to do, paying fines, following instruction etc. We start to realise we have very real power within these discussions and we just need to learn how to respond appropriately to a) get them to back off and leave us alone and b) hold them to account if they proceed unlawfully. Learning the scripts for dealing with the above (so called law enforcement) gave me the basic skeleton for all future interactions and gave me a foundation to get me started on this journey.

Webinar: How To Address Police When Affronted By An Officer

[philip-wainwright]

Thanks again Morag. I am sorry if I am taking up too much of your time but I am sure you understand how frustrating this whole nonsense is. Humans were not meant to confront each other this way but we can thank King Hammurabi and his mob (actually my blood line as well which makes it so much harder to swallow). A colleague told me the other day he tried the live man thing when he was in court (mask issue even though he had an exemption) and the magistrate just looked at him as said ‘you don’t look like a ghost’ and had him arrested on the spot. So now I am not certain if that line is still valid to use, and this is born out in some of the old videos Mark did where he supported such a move, but in later videos that seems to have changed. It is not possible to stay out of their jurisdiction because they seem to be crossing into the private all the time now anyway. Even in his statement, the copper refers to me as a man so does this mean that the word ‘living’ has to precede it? Surely he would have used the word person if he was to stay in his own jurisdiction? The security guard also refers to me as a man in his statement. Can this be used to advantage? My application for my live born information was delivered on the 7th Nov so hopefully something will come back from that before the court case.

Thanks again and have a good weekend. Cheers Philip

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

It sounds like your friend made a statement in court and you cannot be a witness in your own matter (maxim of law). We must always ask questions (three times to gain an agreement if they refuse to answer, or they avoid the question) to get a second witness. We can get the judge as a second witness, the prosecutor as a second witness or the person on the stand as a second witness. We must go into court prepared with case laws, scripts, unrebutted affidavits and private agreements established in a three step notice and lots and lots of study and role play around different scenarios that could manifest in court. If the judge, prosecutor, claimant makes any claims, then the burden of proof is on them and this allows you to ask for evidence of their claim/s and vice versa (so don’t make any claims instead gain agreements).

This is not a place where you can try a couple of tricks or use a couple of things you have heard on a youtube video or from a friend. It takes lots of study and application. You must treat it like a university level qualification if you are to have a chance of success.

The copper and the security guard probably don’t understand how all this works and yes you could potentially use their words to your advantage, they have confessed that you are a man even if it is unwittingly (not knowing they are incriminating themselves)

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

There is a three day special on the modules so now would be the time to buy any that you need.

[philip-wainwright]

Well I’m on the right track then thanks Morag. I just finished watching it. Now to put some letters together as I need to find out who to subpoena before I put my applications into the court.

Thanks again and if you come up with some other relevant stuff please share.

Go well

Philip