Private Community Discussion Forums & Sharing

Find answers, ask questions, and connect with your community around the world.
Share the knowledge. Help one another. Always remembering golden rule of Love thy Neighbor.

  • anandrah

    Member
    October 5, 2022 at 4:21 pm

    It’s a good question. It’s a situation I’ve had to consider before. Thumbs up too for considering use of a process server, an excellent investment in the necessary situation. But, I promote saving money when possible. We shouldn’t think we need to throw money around to achieve a remedy. I am almost certain ‘Delivery’ equals ‘Acceptance’. You seem to know the article has landed. That’s lawfully sufficient. If they don’t check their box it’s not your concern. I can go a step further and from memory, also from memory of Marks comments, the date we dispatch is the delivery. Not the date the respondent receives it. So, for example we serve a notice with a particular date and terms that require a response within 28 days. It’s 28 days of the date of our Notice, which is also our dispatch date. Thats the ‘delivery’ date, lawfully. We don’t say ‘ 28 days from when you receive this..’ Getting back to the original question. Nonethless, sure, we want proof they’ve received it and signed for it. They need to sign for it before they can view the name of the sender. And they might only refuse it if they have a history of receiving ‘unsavoury’ content from you previously. Further, most people are too curious. They would rather read something, and then ignore it, or try and believe they are superior to your correspondence, then out right reject it. Or they might hope your content is vexatious and frivolous and then they can use it against you. The odds on them outright refusing something, and even being in a position to have such foreknowledge without liablity (I mean, knowing it was you, rejecting it, and lawfully getting away with ‘not accepting’ in face of your proof it was delivered) are fairly low. I’ve considered all the angles of this situation already!

    Final tip – if you really, really think they are looking our for your correspondence and trying to dodge it. Use the third party mailer ( named on the 3rd party proof of mailing certificate) as the party signing the reverse of the envelope as the ‘sender’. This is technically correct. And / Or use a different sort of envelope from the one the respondent is expecting. If they expect you to hand write – use an address label. If it’s overseas mail, and the respondent is looking out for’ registered mail from Australia’ ( for example) . Which in that example happens to be in very obvious, non-discrete, big blue and white card satchels, with ‘Australia Post International’ alll over it in massive coloured letters. Send it to a friend in a 3rd country, sealed and inside another envelope. and ask them to dispatch it for you registered post. Their name can be on the 3rd party proof of mailing certificate as the legitimate sender/witness. Ensure everything is scanned to PDF for evidence before hand and theres your full paper trail. Oh and also be sure the tracking service you use is even correct. Follow up with a human enquiry. I was getting a ping-back something hadn’t arrived 8 weeks after I sent it. Turns out it was received after 14 days. Turns out the Australia Post website doesn’t work well with international registered post feedback. I used the postal website for the recipient country for results. This is a GREAT idea. Upon hitting customs of the destination country they had scanned the envelope and created a full delivery narrative and even allowed me to download the signature of delivery.