-
5 Replies
-
Instead of understand you could say comprehend. Innerstand isn’t in any dictionary and may possibly be seen as nonsense or to have no standing in the english language, especially in a court of legislation and commerce wouldn’t you think?
-
Isn’t legislation mumbo jumbo that applies to Fictional Beings anyway…..The Book of Spells and Make Believe?😆 Most legal contracts use words with double meanings or derived from latin, so full disclosure isn’t been offered to the general public. The Great Con to keep the deception alive. Teach society a language in school, but stitch them up with contracts, so they won’t know what they are actually entering.
I heard this about Romley Stewart, he said this is what he asked of Westpac in regards to DOG-LATIN being in the loan contract. They shut his accounts down.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 11 months ago by Ant_made.
-
Yes absolutely, however when we interact with the front line sheeples, saying something like ‘innerstand’ will raise alarm bells for them and they are likely to treat you differently if the masters have told them to watch out for language like that. It’s better to use common vernacular and better still just say “I don’t answer questions” when they ask if you understand.
-
I like living on the edge, maybe I will try Abovestand, for when I am serious and Innerstand might work if I do it with a meditation chant after I say it. It’s 50/50, a good laugh or locked up.
-
Yes, there is no teacher like experience for sure.
-
-
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 11 months ago by
-