-
Australian Taxation Administration Act 1953 – Natural persons
Hi everyone,
I’m currently looking through clauses in the ATAA 1953 to see how to set up the right legal defense for my sister in-law who the ATO slapped with a penalty for recklessly making statements on her tax return.
I saw the following under 8R and 8S:
8R Penalties for offences against sections 8N and 8Q
(1) Subject to subsection (2), an offence against section 8N or 8Q is punishable on conviction by a fine not exceeding 30 penalty units.
(2) Where:
(a) a person is convicted of an offence against section 8N or 8Q;
(b) in a case where the person is a natural person—the Commissioner has elected under subsection 8S(1) to treat the offence otherwise than as a prescribed taxation offence; and
(c) the court before which the person is convicted is satisfied that the person has previously been convicted of a relevant offence;
the penalty that the court may impose in respect of the first‑mentioned offence is a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units or imprisonment for a period not exceeding 12 months, or both.
8S Election to treat offence otherwise than as prescribed taxation offence
(1) The Commissioner may, before the institution of a prosecution of a natural person for an offence against section 8N, or 8Q, or against Division 136 or 137 of the Criminal Code in relation to a taxation law, elect, in writing, to treat the offence otherwise than as a prescribed taxation offence.
(2) Where a prosecution is instituted for an offence in relation to which an election under subsection (1) has been made, the Commissioner shall cause a copy of the election to be filed in the court in which the prosecution is instituted.
Does this Act state that it can seek to prosecute or have jurisdiction over those who claim to be living men or women by grouping them under “natural person”? But then isn’t natural and person mixing jurisdictions and hence is merely to trap people who do this?
God bless,
Brian