-
Simple Art of Letter Writing
Hi folks,
I’ve just watched the above course and it’s beautifully simple in how to write a letter of response.
I’m curious if anyone has done this at this level of simplicity?Also, do the acts/sections referenced need to be replaced with the same Aussie versions? I think he’s referencing NZ acts.
-
11 Replies
-
I enjoyed that one too .
Simple and eloquent, but to the point .
I was watching an older Q&A today , and was thinking how powerful words can be , especially used in a honourable fashion. If you put a S on the front or word , you have sword , which brings to mind the powerful justice tarot card . The scales of justice in one hand of the king , the sword in the other.
-
Bill turner from NZ is a good source as well. https://youtu.be/bDmk0Yg_R6g?si=B7m2K5jkGJXSdA_J
-
I wonder if this relates to the word tetel? Jesus Fulfills the Law
17Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. [and of course Jesus fulfilled the law so we came into a new understanding when He died for our sins]
-
This is wonderful, his letters are very simple and to the point and we need to remember to send them three times to create the agreement so that it has to be recognised as a binding agreement in court. it is a very good video however we need to be aware that a key sentence in the court rules and forms is “..unless a judge orders otherwise’ So this is why we don’t use the rules of the court to protect ourselves because they always have a way built in to them that allows them to side step the rules, we just use their rules and codes of conduct etc of their private businesses to hold them to account in the private agreements we make with them and then in court we can follow the non consent process for court.
-
This would be a great letter for unsolicited approaches by the council claiming a complaint from a neighbour has forced them to act and fine us or claims for dog registration, both being forms of unsolicited offers of contract.
-
-
Some people have had success using this letter but we also need to have a deep understanding of how to interact with these pirates if they won’t back off, if not we can get into difficulties we don’t know how to get out of as with this comment under the video. If he was with SE he would have some remedies… “Bill, I used this letter for a government collection agency in Queensland. (Just in case its important to know, as I was travelling interstate I did not receive the first ‘fine’ and only responded to the collection agency letter). However, before I received their response (two weeks) money had been withdrawn from my bank account. According to their ‘Act’ the bank had to give them my bank account details, and did. When I rang to discuss this bank robbery I was told that ‘ my letter sounded like a sovereign citizens letter’ so they acted quickly and swiftly to take the money. They also told me I “should have called them” and not write. Any advise as to how this new move by these criminals can be stopped? The collection agency was SPER , Queensland. I addressed my letter to the Registrar of SPER directly.”
-
Here’s a comment about the Australian Act under the video… “So, in looking for an Au version of the NZ High court rules the closest I can find is S22.01 & S22.07 of the Federal Court Rules 2011
“22.01 Notice to admit facts or documents
A party (the first party) may serve on another party (the second party) a notice,
in accordance with Form 41 (the notice to admit), requiring the second party, for
the purpose of the proceeding only, to admit the truth of any fact and the
authenticity of any document specified in the notice to admit.
22.07 Judgement on admissions
If a party makes an admission, another party may apply to the Court for any
Judgement or order to which the party is entitled on the admission.”…” -
This is great information Morag, I appreciate it.
I was blown away by the simplicity of his letter writing, but do like the detail included in the SE one that I followed for Directors id non-consent.I like that they are required to provide evidence against particulars that make the claim in notice (in my current case from the EQC) true and lawful in their own system.
-
Yes his letter was great, however I modified a little so that it would have no loopholes in it for the adversary to potentially hook on to. I also agree about Mark’s documents, his are a cut above the rest and just cover all bases, they are amazingly well written.
-
i used to have my head in employment law for AUS, UK, couple of US states, and a pinch of the Middle East…as well as OHS here in AUS, so know how long it takes to interpret them and where they can trip you up inside of themselves and with each other.
Mark’s documents are fabulous! Really appreciate all he does here 🙂
-
p.s. you too!
You are an ace at answering questions and sharing and generous with the knowledge you share 😀
-
-
-