Firearms Digital Identity/Licence

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

Here’s a suggestion: Maybe, “Thank you for your kind offer however I do not consent to any new contract without negotiation and a meeting of the minds as is it not true that no contract may be changed unilaterally without the consent of the other party?”

[Sean]

Thank you for your kind and prompt reply. Will try something like that for sure.

[newguy1113]

They are not talking to you, they are addressing the legal fiction that signed up for a license that they have authority over because you haven’t taken control yet. Any response without the proper status is futile because you are considered a co-trustee/government employee and not following the trust indenture, which is a breach of trust and will be detrimental to your “person” the presumed co-trustee. All these letters do nothing because they are under no obligation to reply or rebut your questions, you cannot get a default judgement against them either without the proper status.

but you could try it for now until you work your way to competence, they might back off simply cos they know you know what they are doing, but i wouldn’t rely on that given the tyranny in the works especially since this is a firearm issue.

[Sean]

Thanks for your reply.

I have sent them back a letter asking a few questions of their fraudulent activity so no doubt I am expecting a reply.

I may send them a copy of my registered Birth Certificate Trust on the PPSR when they do come back to me.

Kind regards

[newguy1113]

Hi

Accusing them of fraud is dishonourable, profitable to them and an exercise in futility. You also can’t sustain an accusation of fraud or treason because you have a remedy outside the court, even if you took them to court the judge would throw it out for failure to state claim upon which relief can be granted, if they don’t order a psych evaluation and lock you up.

They don’t make it easy cos there are minimum contacts set up like land mines, all these compelled benefits. Also, you accepted a benefit by getting a license, and he who accepts a benefit must bear the burden.

So, you need to take control of your estate so the record can be corrected at the ATO as well, rebutting the presumptions of trusteeship/debtor/surety and returning to competency. At the moment you’re communicating with them as an accommodating party (cos you didn’t qualify your signature when you signed up for the benefit), a trustee who has gone rogue.

Learning the foundations of this organised commercial fraud is key. That would be my main focus if i were you while trying what you are currently doing to hold them off. We’re just learning like everyone else here, and the understanding of what is going on first, i believe, is key. It’s quite simple what they are doing and its uniform across the board, once you understand one transaction you can understand it all.

All the best and God bless.

[Sean]

Hello and thank you for all your help it is much appreciated.

I am asking them a question about misrepresentation ‘using the caps lock surname.’ So, I am not accusing them I am only asking the question…

what you reckon?

[newguy1113]

P.S If the parties on the ppsr are wrong the whole thing collapses and reverts back to the strawman.

[Sean]

Believe me I hope I did it correct as well!!

I watched Bill Turners video on how to go about it so hopefully its correct.

[Sean]

God bless