-
If the UN/WHO/WEF become our govt, what use is Crown/Common Law?
So this thought has been plaguing me of late. Once the UN guns arrive(if they haven’t already) to keep us “safe” during the next big “catastrophe”, what court will we appeal to with our common law arguments?
Will UN armed forces be open to “conditionally accept” their offer to contract, or challenge their constitutional standing, or query their code of conduct etc etc.?
When the masses are happily plugged into the latest mind-game being played…the group of us who are hunkering down to maintain our independence will have who to defend our sovereignty?
Sorry for the fatalistic angle on our future!
My wife and I are starting to talk about “thresholds” .
E.g.
“When this happens” we convert our assets to bitcoin, “when this happens” we book our flights to Nicaragua.
If you have opinions and strategies in mind for your own freedom when/if the worst case scenario happens, please share .
Or if you can convince us that we’re being chicken littles…we welcome any positive inputs .
Cheers Paul
-
3 Replies
-
if the army takes over then rule of law is gone.
-
If the army takes over…
That’s already happened. The army was stationed at each end of suburban streets during lockdown in Western Sydney.
Is it only me that sees the past 3 years as simply a dress rehearsal?
A one-world governing authority is not accountable to any party/law other than the goals which their funding dictates.
Do students/practitioners of the Solutions Empowerment school of thought get short-listed as the first trouble-makers to round up? Who do we appeal to if that happens?
As we are squirrelling away, tunnel-visioned, at 3-step Notice plans to avoid infringements, income tax, digital ID, over-reach of councils etc., are we missing the freight train coming down the track?
A local Magistrate who throws out our clash with “democratic” institutions will look more like a council worker holding a Stop/Slow sign in comparison to the machinery of the WHO, WEF, UN who genocide millions of coloured people in the name of white supremacists who need reliable drugs and/or biological weapons.
When the army takes over… who’s interested in getting locked up indefinitely for being one of the push-back types?
It leads to a question that I’ve never quite found an adequate answer for,
How long will the serfs/slaves (i.e. us) be allowed to use the legal/common law/trust/foundation/offshore tax haven systems to the same advantage as the elites?
And, in the meantime… is anyone here–the enlightened thinkers/observers of the world(@ SE)– prepared for a time to exit stage left?
Plenty have run to the hills, gone “off-grid” and sunk all their savings into a monster truck that can go anywhere but for how long and how far does that get you…the modern westerner who has never learnt to grow anything, couldn’t tell a bunya nut from a beehive and still needs a diesel refill after 1000 clicks.
I’m not hysterical, I’m watching the implosion of trust in all institutions that until now, have taken care of business for us so we can “tap-n-go”, work from home, facetime our kids across the globe…free!, and generally hypnotise ourselves into thinking we can take care of ourselves without Coles, Shell and the Bank.
If the army takes over…it’s too late but surely there are signs in the interim that can alert us to the inevitable?
Who cares about income tax, digital ID etc when the choice becomes get jabbed or get locked up, get digital ID or don’t go out in public, stop listening to “disinformation” or lose social credit points.
Looking for more thoughts/ideas on this.
-
This reply was modified 2 years ago by pbcook. Reason: typo
-
This reply was modified 2 years ago by
-
-
These are the things you need to find your own internal answers for and then weigh up your choices and work out how you wish to proceed. There is no way to predict exactly what will happen in the future. We have to do our best to insure ourselves against most possibilities that we can think of. Trusts are not the possession of the system they have been around long before this lot of pirates came into power and are available for anyone to use. They have no jurisdiction over unregistered Trusts, that’s why they want us to be registered so they have jurisdiction, if jurisdiction meant nothing, they wouldn’t care whether we registered them or not.. A Trust is simply a written agreement between parties, can you tell me how you think they can intervene in that when they have no jurisdiction to do so. If they ignored that and started plundering private trusts then their own trusts would be up for grabs as well so they stick to their code to protect themselves, they just want us to believe we don’t have access to the same things but we do. We’ve got to ditch the fear or at least channel it into affirmative action before we can really start to move forward effectively. Fear can freeze people up like deer in headlights or it can galvanise people into action. Dean Clifford says some thing like ‘If they want to stop me they’ll have to shoot me. Meanwhile I’m getting on with protecting my family’