marriage License The real truth

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

Thanks for sharing, that is a useful document. My opinion is that this is the most important paragraph of this article.. “My thought on this is can it really be considered a true contract as one becomes
aware of the failure by the State to make full disclosure of the terms and
conditions. A contract must be entered into knowingly, intelligently,
intentionally, and with fully informed consent. Otherwise, technically there is no
contract.”…. When we understand that and all the implications of that, it puts us in a stronger position and on top of that knowing to only refer to ‘children’ as offspring to keep us out of the realm of legalese and do the same with any other legalese words they are using to entrap us. So we use this information in any affidavits we are creating in order to repel any approaches made by so called ‘authorities.

[saul-james]

Great find Dave, thanks for sharing. I had heard about this recently through Brandon Joe Williams. His suggestion is to have the license dissolved and removed from the public system otherwise you are still bound by it. It was interesting to note that even when divorced the contract is still in effect albeit slightly modified.

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

Only the person/strawman is bound by it. Living men and women are only bound by it if they entered the contract with full disclosure and a meeting of the minds. Because it is done in deception the contract is null and void. The only way the system can get around that is to get the living men and women to act as surety by agreeing they are the name, this creates consent for a bad contract and by agreeing we are the name, we also agree to take liability for anything that bad contract can impose on the strawman.

[Dave777]

Brandon has got some good information but he can leave out the course language thrown in. Words are a spell so we need to be careful what and how we speak.