POLICING-THE-POLICE-WITH-COMMAN LAW

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

Have you got the original link?

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

In the main he handled this well, he needs to ask more questions rather than making statements because under the rules of equity he needs a second witness. If he asks the constable “Are we in agreement I am a man?” Rather than making statements. Statements put the burden of proof on him, questions allow him to gain a second witness, as a man cannot be a witness in his own matter. He did ask some great questions having said that.

[wills]

I agree as well as ask for ID at the start not in the middle but he did do well

composed calm, here is another video which you can compare

and i downloaded these of https://www.larryhannigan.com.au/

Change Thumbnail

• Generating thumbnail…
• Generating thumbnail…

Change

7:42

7:42

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

He handled that so well considering he had a bully boy threatening him and he was prepared with case law as well. The one thing he could have done was when they asked him if he was refusing he could have said ‘I am prepared to give you a breath sample when you can show me the blah blah blah” so then it would be a conditional acceptance and not a refusal.

[sarahclark]

does anyone know what documents he was asking the officer to read? Thanks

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

It could have been a Cease and Desist Notice as in this part of the site http://solutionsempowerment.org/resources/non-consent/, it could have been a Claim of Right as in this Module http://solutionsempowerment.org/p/module-27-the-claim-of-right-process-stake-your-claim/

Non-consent Notice Generators

[morag-janet-of-the-hill-family]

The other Notice sounded like a conditional acceptance

Conditional_Acceptance_Police.pdf 73 KB PDF - Click to view

Options

• Copy Download Link

[whitelight]

It sounds like he was asking for the evidence that the act was proclaimed as law as an act is a law in the making. Most acts have never been passed as law. In Addition the former Chief Justice in 1942 was quoted referring to ‘pretend laws’, so this was happening back then, here is the quote, “a pretend law made in excess of power is not and never has been a law at all. Anybody in the country is entitled to disregard it”.

https://onthehillgilayjun.blogspot.com/2017/10/a-pretended-law-made-in-excess-of-power.html?m=1

https://youtu.be/umVj5XQYAi8

[Ant_made]

Good watch. I’ve sent this to a few people who don’t believe what I have been saying for a while now.

Cheers

[whitelight]

If they don’t believe you this site might help, it’s a lot more convincing as they have all the evidence and court case references.

https://cirnow.com.au/the-commonwealth-of-australia-constitution-act-1900-1/

• This reply was modified 2 years, 6 months ago by  whitelight.

[sarahclark]

Thank you all so much for your knowledge and support, great community. Thank you Thank you

[paul-from-the-house-of-dickinson]

I applaud them for all for trying to stand up for themselves. But they ended up giving the name in the end. All the policy enforcers want is the name and even saying Paul Anthony from the house of Dickinson is still giving them the name. Im sorry to say it but that is all they want.