This article applies to people who go into court to argue and to people who use lawyers thinking that the lawyer is impartial. It makes it clear in this article that the lawyer is NOT impartial. The people who want to establish agreements do none of what this article talks about. A JP asked me if my matter was a sovereign citizen matter. I told her that the words sovereign citizen are nowhere in my documents and that they are not about that. When they ask what they are now I will just say something like It’s a Default Notice. However JPs are frightened because it sounds like they are bullied as well. I went to a JP who said something like “I will sign anything because I have no liability for what is in your document and if I turn you down it means you will have to seek out another jp and that’s not fair when you have made an appointment to get this done. I’m a bit of a rebel” Well about three days later a friend of mine rang him to make an appointment and he asked if she needed an affidavit witnessed as a true and correct copy. When she said yes he backed out of seeing her, so it sounded like he had been leaned on for carrying out his duties as he should. She said he sounded really frightened. So I plan on ringing a Notary Public and if he refuses to help them I will use schedule 2 and use three witnesses. I will make sure I have evidence that the Notary would not do his job.
Protest where the services of a notary cannot be obtained
This is from s 95 of the BOE Act 1908 (NZ)
Aus BOE Act 1909 has the same provisions