Homepage › Private Community Forums › Holding Position & Settling Matters Privately › This is a real case from 1968 › Reply To: This is a real case from 1968
-
No he doesn’t seem to be, but maybe it was an exercise to deter people from challenging the banks. Just as Alex Jones the shill went to court over something (he was talking about the false flag shooting at one of the schools in his podcasts and they prosecuted him for it) and he just gave in to the ruling that was made even though there was lots of evidence to show it was a false flag event (he had to pay reparations to the families) and it put bad case law in place that effectively made it much more easy to prosecute anyone and penalise them financially for questioning false flag events.