[bonnynclyde]

Hello. We’re just compiling an affidavit for our Director’s ID response and were curious about how the exhibits were actually labelled. Does anyone have any guidance of whether the exhibit number is actually written on the true and accurate copies of evidence or labelled. Does it detract from the veracity of the exhibit if it is written on?

[bonnynclyde]

Hi Morag

Thanks for your comments and feedback. You are very generous with your time in these forums. Thank you. As we mentioned to Dave above I think we were outwitted. We’ll survive. I think you’re right about fish hooks and baits over giving jurisdiction. If you do the study and role play you’ve probably got a better chance of winning.

[bonnynclyde]

Hi Dave

Thanks for your reply and I’m sorry to hear about your experience.

Good on you for learning and trying a new pathway.

I think we were outwitted by the magistrate on this occasion and should have appeared in person.

I think we were making some progress.

We like the cut and thrust of what Mark is teaching here. Obviously as Morag and others have commented, it does take a lot of study and practice as well as time.

On reflection, for us, we probably don’t feel its worth the time investment that’s involved and are more motivated to generate wealth, tolerate the parasites and mobilise with others for a more lasting cultural and political reform.

[bonnynclyde]

Hi Hansie. Sorry for the delay in responding. We were away travelling and have just got back in to view your message.

This was our go at it….

Dear Joseph Longo and others,

It has come to my attention that ASIC failed or refused to reply and answer my previous demand notices titled “Notice of Conditional Acceptance, Notice and Demand for Further and Better Particulars and Notice of Liability (the Notice) dated 23 January 2023 and “Default Notice, Notice and Demand for Further and Better Particulars and Notice of Liability” dated 8 February 2023 and “Final Notice, Notice and Demand for Further and Better Particulars and Notice of Liability” dated 23 February 2023. The Notices were in response to ASIC’s new requirement that all Directors forward to ASIC their private personal confidential commercial information (private property) by 30 November 2022, allegedly under new legislation incorporated within the Act titled “Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)”.

Your failure to reply was your third default.

In addition it has also come to my attention that in the process of delivering these three notices to you, that a signed document titled “Declaration in the Format of an Affidavit and Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right” and an unsigned document titled “Affidavit Of Claimant” was omitted. These documents accompany this letter.

Should you sign the accompanying document titled “Affidavit of Claimant”, accepting full and complete personal liability for any harm or commercial damages caused me by my supply of information pertaining to my Director ID, and in which case should you express to me in a timely manner, and certainly prior to 14 days from date of this letter, I shall consider your offer to supply my confidential commercial information – private property to you.

I thank you in advance for your prompt reply addressing this matter.

[bonnynclyde]

Thanks Mark. We included to strengthen the argument but yes, all does take time!

[bonnynclyde]

Hi SE Websmaster

The inclusion (in the non-consent process #4) of the declaration, Fee Schedule, Cruden v Neale Annexure and Affidavit of Claimant looks very solid and I think would strengthen our case and argument for not consenting to the supply of our private commercial information for the Directors ID.

In our journey, of response to the Directors’ ID, we are now compiling our Round 4 Affidavit having served 3 notices using the earlier original module edition.

Would it be legally valid and honorable for us to send this additional information (Declaration, Fee Schedule, Cruden v Neale Annexure and Affidavit of Claimant) and apologise for not including it in our earlier communications and then giving Joseph and Chris another 14 days to respond before compiling and sending them our affidavit?

OR is too late for that?

[bonnynclyde]

We really appreciate you sharing your experience and advice. Thank you so much.

[bonnynclyde]

Okay. Thanks.