[damianx303]

Gday shaunm,

Yes. I would be interested in this.

Please contact me privately at drm9@yahoo.com

cheers.

Damian

[damianx303]

Going straight to the source…..!!! wicked.

What were the notices you sent?

And how have things transpired since?

Cheers,

Damian

[damianx303]

G’day GANG!!

I’m in Victoria.

Really struggling to get MY source doc and My 2 kids even – 12 & 14yo.

Just wondering if getting a stat dec or affidavit from my Mum, regarding me being born would be useful, and if so, who should witness it?….I would also do my own affidavit……AND

…………..if doing the same for my kids is sufficient. IE, my wife and I to do stat decs or affidavits for our Kids births.

Thanks guys.

[damianx303]

I agree with <b style=”background-color: var(–bb-content-background-color); font-family: inherit; font-size: inherit; color: var(–bb-body-text-color);”>morag-janet

I can guide you with those other things i raised previously regarding your case. They too are very powerful.

There are many elements that the SRO are in breach of through investigations – in studying specific legislation and their code of conduct too.

if you are still interested in those aspects, drop me a line on my email drm9@yahoo.com to discuss further your particulars. I’m not sure how S.E. will view that, it may be to their discretion to allow an off line communication, but its all help at the end of the day.

Cheers,

Damian

[damianx303]

see previous response chessflower.

Firstly, in any dealing with these authorities, you must provide evidence.

Under the Land Valuation Act 1960, it states in section 5 that “all things must be taken into consideration”

ALL THINGS.

There is also a section somewhere that states, “the capacity for the land/property to generate an income”

So you need to prove to them that something is not equitable, that the current claim is unfair, unreasonable, is likened to unjust enrichment, burdensome, breach’s the Charter of Human Rights Victoria (property rights) and so on, breaches legislation etc…. To these assertations they will need to provide a rebuttal or some form of adequate “reply”. Remember – silence is a “response”, careful with choice of words.

A non-rebuttal/inadequate reply is their acquiescence or agreement to your assertation/statements which you can use against them in court through affidavit if the matter cant be resolved before hand.

This is exactly where i am at now with SRO. multiple letters latter (all hand delivered with photographic receipt of delivery), a huge amount of evidence of a inequitable, unjust, self enriching, unfair, unreasonable, burdensome tax system, and their acknowledgement of my correspondence, which was now about 2 months ago.

Basically, SRO claims $10,500 in land tax from an evidenced incorrect land valuation of an investment property that generates $24,000.

1. The amount is incorrect because the valuation is incorrect and

2. Almost 50% of property revenue is unjust, unfair, unreasonable, burdensome etc….

IS THAT EQUITABLE ???????

The answer is no. Anyone can see that. Any court will see that.

They have got this so, so so wrong.

So you need to go back to them and express principles based on equity in combination with all the maxims of law at your disposal.

My favorite is:

“EQUITY WILL NOT SUFFER A WRONG WITHOUT REMEDY”

Maxims are extremely powerful. When combined with laws of Equity, where there is an unjust situation, these 2 principles will open the doors for justice.

[damianx303]

Your best and most powerful tool, is there own, which they can not defend against.

You / we must all learn the “Laws of Equity”.

This is our TRUE and only ticket for freedom.

There is plenty of case law on this too.

But, you have to do your own research into it.

Nothing comes to those who seek the easy way out.

And there is nothing easy about Law, but laws of equity is pretty straight forward. Once you understand how to communicate with “them”.

The 3 step process has some validity.

We will break current legislations only by way of using laws of equity, high court and chancery.

That’s more than likely where things will need to go to restore balance and fairness into the system.

Here’s a starting point for you. This will save you about 2 years of rabbit hole digging.

SUPREME COURT ACT 1986 – SECT 29

Law and equity to be concurrently administered

(1) Subject to the provisions of this or any other Act, every court exercising jurisdiction in Victoria in any civil proceeding must continue to administer law and equity on the basis that, if there is a conflict or variance between the rules of equity and the rules of the common law concerning the same matter, the rules of equity prevail.

Good luck.

www8.austlii.edu.au

SUPREME COURT ACT 1986 - SECT 3 Definitions

Australasian Legal Information Institute (AustLII), a joint facility of UTS and UNSW Faculties of Law.

[damianx303]

agree with that too

[damianx303]

Its a residential rental.

Very old and worn house, but value of land is apparently very high.

[damianx303]

I am on the brink of full blown dispute with the Vic SRO.

My land value sky rockets, so the land tax assessment does the same, yet I have no benefit whatsoever of the value increase, until one day, if I sell – yet SRO claims EVERY Year, Yet also slogged with CGT.

Also, the land tax now makes up 32% of the GROSS earnings, before expenses (including rates), and before the NET amount added to personal income for another slog of tax.

This can not be constitutional.

I doubt this “legislation” is promoting prosperity for Auzzies with a 2nd ppty. (i inherited this – whoops, I’m sorry) and is in “good Governance” as stipulated in the constitution.

Happy to take this offline and discuss seriously how “WE” the power of the people can go forward.

[damianx303]

This Auzzie is good too.

Brian Shaw.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJTq7qPuaFU&list=PLDd5NDCTq6UzfS2-p7OJ9q72u8uf4DoVE&index=38&t=229s

[damianx303]

True. Good point.

[damianx303]

Brilliant.

Thanks for that.

I’d also recommend Frank O’Collins of Ucadia, one-heaven.

[damianx303]

Me too. CBA.

Stay away from Westpac. I know from experience. Not good at all.

[damianx303]

Hi There.

Question.

When we make a donation or contribution out of our PUBLIC business into our Private Trusts/Foundations using affidavits and so on, is there any concern for us that the trust or foundations are not publicly recognized as DGR (deductible gift recipients).

Will the ATO have issue with this as (one of their own – PUBLIC entities) performing an legitimate transaction to an unendorsed DGR (Private Trust/Foundation)??

See website link.

https://www.ato.gov.au/Non-profit/Getting-started/Getting-endorsed-for-tax-concessions-or-as-a-DGR/Is-my-organisation-eligible-for-DGR-endorsement-/DGR-categories/

There are two types of deductible gift recipients (DGRs), those:

• endorsed by the ATO
• listed by name in the tax law.

Understanding what we do in the Private IS private.

Its just about getting the fruits of our labour that are in the PUBLIC across most safely with NO risks.

I’m a commercial builder so parts of what i have to do a absolutely PUBLIC!!! I can’t avoid this.

Due to this, I’m of the opinion it might be safer for now, until confirmed, that invoicing (Non-gst/NAT3348) process from the trusts and foundations to the Corporate entity will be best.

Your thoughts always greatly appreciated.

[damianx303]

Yeah.

Thanks for that mate. Nice one. Good points. I will check out mod14.

Cheers.

[damianx303]

In a way.

Although terms and conditions is not how i think of it until it comes to making them an offer.

Your questions/assertions is what really puts them on notice and creates the equitable estoppel.

That’s what you want to achieve.

If you haven’t done module 29 – go to that now. That will definitely steer you in the right direction.

Got ot go bro. Have a great day.

[damianx303]

You’ll need to come up with your own T&C’s I think.

Be carefull with Fee schedule. Apparently, many people have exploited this too much, so when this attached might not put you in good sted.

Yes.

– Ask if they are responsible for their own actions,

– Ask for thier P.I. provider and insurer.

They will know you mean business and that you have put THEM on notice.

I’m not all the way through yet, so will be able to advise in full once the infringement matter is withdrwan/discharged.

[damianx303]

Gday mate.

Good question.

I cant say for sure except still run the processes I guess. Give or take a day or 2, week or 2, month or 2 (ill advised though).

My feeling is the intentions of what you are doing and the actions that take place.

Choose your battles and go with your gut. That what I’m doing.

Just rememebr this. YOU are not a THING. That’s what they want you to be.

[damianx303]

Thanks for that bro.

I have gone over this one before. Just needing some more substance if you know what i mean.

Cheers.

Damian

[damianx303]

was following module 29, but it doesnt go into much detail beyong the first 2 notices.

[damianx303]

It might be possible that this is where it all begins, in getting BACK into the private.

They even tell us it’s important so we become citizens and then we can access the benefits and privileges that go with it.

Have a read of “Fruit from the poisonous tree by Melvin Stamper” (which is actually a legal term).

https://chapter2books.indielite.org/book/9780595524969

And “behold the pale horse”.

Be careful.

It’s a very deep rabbit hole.

[damianx303]

Interesting read.

Interesting WORDS.

Birth Rego/Cert

Victorian Law Reform Commission

https://www.lawreform.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Birth-registration-and-birth-certificates_Consultation-paper.pdf

Introduction

1.1 Birth registration is a significant life event which creates a relationship between the individual and the state. A child becomes a person before the law1 when their birth is registered.

1.2 Obtaining a birth certificate is a further step in creating an individual’s identity. This step can only occur once a birth is registered. A birth certificate is the ‘instrument universally recognised as the fundamental evidentiary document establishing personal identification’.2 Without a birth certificate a person is unable to invoke their full rights as a citizen.

1.3 These rights include: enrolling at school or to vote; obtaining a passport, Medicare card, driver licence or tax file number; and accessing various government benefits.

1.4 In short, birth registration establishes the legal identity of a child by placing them on the state’s records, and a birth certificate is the formal record of this status provided to the individual by the state.

1.5 Both birth registration and birth certificates are fundamental to our existence as citizens in a developed society. It is often taken as given that these events occur routinely in a developed country. The Commission is concerned that this may not be the case for all sectors of our community.

[damianx303]

Sounds like 2nd witness. You can’t be the judge in your own matter as Mark says

Notarized should be ok.

Even affidavit??? No??

[damianx303]

Yeah. Good call.

And funny how they make it extremely difficult to find these forms. You would almost think it was intentional.

Tongue in cheek.

Kind of confirms that they are concealing all this remedy

It’s worth the exercise sometimes. The ones who seeketh, shall findeth, and be the knowledgeable ones.

[damianx303]

That’s great.

I’m searching for this or something similar for Victoria. I might need to change my search words.

Thanks heaps.

[damianx303]

Well done.

What was the form you printed straight off the BDM website?

[damianx303]

Or register for no reg foundation through this website under resources. I’ve been in contact with Peter Duff multiple times recently. Foundation nearly done.

[damianx303]

I’ll keep an eye out.

Thanks for that.

[damianx303]

Brilliantly awesome morag-janet-of-the-hill-family.

Thanks heaps.

Answered my questions.

[damianx303]

Thanks for that.

[damianx303]

Of coarse. Please do.

Cheers.

Damian.