[Robert]

Hi Kate,

I just found this thread.

Very interesting how deceitful, and fraudulent they’re openly willing to be.

Could you please provide and update on what happened, or where you’re at with it now?

Regards,

R.

[Robert]

Hi jfreo1,

Great job at staying confident, and holding your position.

From what I heard, some errors that may have been made were:

1. You made claims/statements about the prosecutions acceptance via default, as opposed to utilising the second witness. I believe your claim should have been phrased as a question to the justice, to verify the claim.

2. By the sounds of it, you left the “bar”, and therefore nothing you were saying from the back is “heard” or on the public record.

3. Unfortunately, even though you were confident, saying “with respect” and making fantastic points, I would assume they would have claimed you were being belligerent and argumentative, despite them not respecting you, and letting you talk initially.

It sounded like you may have bought into the frustration they were trying to impose.

I could be completely wrong, and am happy to be corrected, but they’re my thoughts from what I heard.

I hope it may be helpful, or give some insight, or someone else can clarify.

Great job nonetheless!

An update would be great.

Good luck.

R