[SE.Founder]

Hi Rising Sun. May I suggest rather than airing frustration publically, that you come to us at Solutions Empowerment to inform us about the bounced cheque, as three other members did – all win a 2 day period of ech other.

We wourselves were unaware BCU no longer honoured its own cheques after 24.05.24. BCU certainly didn’t tell us. We are aware though no cheque books would be issued by them after 1 May 2024. However, even cheques drafted prior to 1 May 2024 were not honoured after 24 May 2024, despite funds being within the SE account.

If blame needs to be directed somewhere, perhaps its the Banks or the legislators in government who drafted legislation to remove cheques from the marketplace.

I hope this assists you in clarification of why the cheque was dishonoured. Regards Mark, SE Founder

[SE.Founder]

Hi

The no foreign beneficiaries has nothing to do with Solutions Empowerment Trusts. It pertains to recent legislation that arose universally similtaineously. We only comply “on paper” so our Trusts are seen to conform so our clients can remain doing business within the public realm. If we were seen not to comply (doesn’t mean we actually comply) then our Trusts could not conduct business within the public realm. Hope that makes sense. Cheers Mark

[SE.Founder]

Hi

SMSF is a public realm entity and cannot be mixed with a private realm enity such as a Non Reg Trust. There are ways to “manouvre” the funds so at least some can escape into the private realm. Details can be shared on a Trust appointment. Cheers Mark

[SE.Founder]

Hi Sean

Despite every State and Territory having their own Duties Act, they are all unique to each state. The reason for an exemption of Stamp Duty varies between States. You need to read through the WA Duties Act to locate what exceptions and the reason for it is. The other alternative is that it is legitimate to “gift” your property to a Trust and therefore bypass stamp duty

Hope that helps. Regards Mark

[SE.Founder]

Hi cozmofo

I just read through the threads

My apologies for the late reply. Am totally overwhelmed and work lately till 1am in attempts to keep up.

in relation to your matter, this is precisely how I would handle it

1. Have a private default judgment in place via the private administrative process (3 notices that are unanswered0

2. File an answer or reply, whatever the family Court document is that answers the application. That is essential. You list by one paragraph at a time any pleadings of fact that are relevant to your case. You also answer every paragraph your ex has made in her application, either with “admit” or “deny” then give the reason why you deny

3. Ensure you draw up an affidavit and state all your facts, then support each statement of fact with evidence by way of exhibit to the affidavit.

Ensure you answer each statement of fact in your ex’s affidavit, if there is one. If your ex’s is the last affidavit filed, yr ex will will by default. Never ever let yr opposite have the last filed affidavit. If one is filed – you make dam sure you answer it so yours is the last one filed. If the facts are unrebutted in your affidavit, it will stand as truth in commerce and you will win by default because you can then seek a summary judgment on the facts disclosed within that last affidavit.

You want to win? you gotta be smarter than your opponent and their liar – lawyer & ouytmanouvre them. It is simply “strategy”

I hope this helps

Off to. y next urgent job

cheers

mark

[SE.Founder]

Yes, it is stronger to do all the Non Consents separately. Claim of Right is clear about your rights. The Non Consent processes makes it more specifically clear what you don’t consent to. Cheers mark

[SE.Founder]

Best info I can give is use your descretion. It’s useful to send the respondents the additional docs and strengthens your case for your right to Non Consent. Is extra time though so you make the call. Cheers Mark

[SE.Founder]

Never be intimmidated by threats. Threats is all the public have to enforce compliance. When the threat bluff is called, that public authority is found “wanting”. The King with no clothes

[SE.Founder]

For the benefit of all the Non Consent process users, please use common sense throughout the process. Ie scan all completed documents including proof of mailing and delivery. Also, who ever are listed as respondents, indicates precisely who you are to mail out or email too. Cheers Mark