Forum Replies Created

  • catriona

    Member
    November 28, 2022 at 4:51 pm in reply to: Director DIN

    Oh yes good idea not to supply an email. Make them work. I just took mine out!

  • catriona

    Member
    November 28, 2022 at 4:50 pm in reply to: Director DIN

    Yes, you need to send the first notice to ABRS. You are definitely not screwed!

    It is still before the 30 November which automatically puts a hold on any due dates they are attempting to enforce, that is my understanding from what Mark has said.

  • catriona

    Member
    November 28, 2022 at 4:17 pm in reply to: Director DIN

    Hi Liberty, I ended up doing exactly what you did, after I read through it again it seemed only article 13 stayed ASIC. Sending both my “reply to ASIC” and my first notice to ABRS tomorrow. I have really enjoyed this process and feel even clearer doing it a second time through with ABRS. Thanks for your replies!!!

  • catriona

    Member
    November 25, 2022 at 4:40 pm in reply to: Director DIN

    Hi Liberty, thanks for your reply. Yes, I downloaded the modified ZIP
    where Mark suggests a response to ASIC. In reading your response about
    reposting to ABRS it sounds like you simply changed the addressee to
    ABRS but left the contents identical. That’s what I was referring to,
    because if you read each of the 22 items you realise they are related to
    ASIC’s role and not that of the ABRS. My intention is make sure I have a
    clear and pertinent letter for the ABRS so that it stands up
    legally…eg for point 7i, 7ii, 7iii, 7iv at the very least, where they
    agree to accept a 10 million (or whatever) liability for misusing my
    property, there is no point saying “you, ASIC” agree where “you” now
    means ABRS. It makes this point in the notice contradictory and possibly
    void. What are your thoughts??

  • catriona

    Member
    November 25, 2022 at 4:33 pm in reply to: Director DIN

    Hi Liberty, thanks for your reply. Yes, I downloaded the modified ZIP where Mark suggests a response to ASIC. In reading your response about reposting to ABRS it sounds like you simply changed the addressee to ABRS but left the contents identical. That’s what I was referring to, because if you read each of the 22 items you realise they are related to ASIC’s role and not that of the ABRS. My intention is make sure I have a clear and pertinent letter for the ABRS so that it stands up legally…eg for point 7i, 7ii, 7iii, 7iv at the very least, where they agree to accept a 10 million (or whatever) liability for misusing my property, there is no point saying “you, ASIC” agree where “you” now means ABRS. It makes this point in the notice contradictory and possibly void. What are your thoughts??

  • catriona

    Member
    November 25, 2022 at 10:40 am in reply to: Director DIN

    I had the same response from ASIC that others did. I am now looking at how to re-write the first notice to reflect the change of address to ASIC. Iam not sure whether I should replace “ASIC” with “ABRS” all throughout the document. It gets a bit confusing because it is ASIC issuing fines, so items 5, 7,13,14 and 15 are possibly not relevant to the ABRS or need major re -wording.