Woman used Non-Consent Process To Have Matter Dismissed from Court

Responses

1. 

   morag-janet-of-the-hill-family November 14, 2022

   Awesome! She did well staying calm and holding her position.

2. 

   SE.Founder November 14, 2022

   I hope our members are encouraged to use all the processes SE teaches. The Non Consent process is very powerful, along with “Holding Position”. Enjoy. Mark

3. 

   SE.Founder November 16, 2022

   Guys, the reason the Non Consent process works so well is 100% due to the Rules of Equity prevailing. All processes must be fair & equitable, all being a component of contract. Key essential element of Equity & Contract – Offer and Acceptance = Consent. To express you don’t consent equates to a refusal of the offer and hence no meeting of the minds. For the reason of court’s oppressive attempts to “force” their offer on you by constantly repeating that the court takes it you plea “Not Guilty”, when in fact you didn’t plea at all, is to obtain your agreement by assent (silence) that you accepted the magistrate’s offer to you having entered a plea of Not Guilty, thereby participating with the Court. Break the Magistrate’s presumption by immediately declaring “No, did I not express that I don’t consent to participating with the Court, I don’t consent & I have no interest in the matter, are we done?”. The matter will be dismissed! Try it! Be well rewarded and gain your confidence so as to be a superman/woman in addressing the public and it’s various and spurious offers. Wish you all well. Mark

   1. 

      damianx303 December 13, 2022

      Thanks for that Mark.

      It would seem at this stage, I’ll be going to Magistrates Crt in Melb for a council issued parking infringement (where no signs are even displayed).

      Wondering if anyone out there might be interest to come along and witness, and record audio discreetly, while I hold my position. No date as yet.

      1. 

         yort March 22, 2023

         how’d you go?

         1. 

            damianx303 April 2, 2023

            Interestingly, I considered the letter/notice “advising” me of a court date as simply an offer.
            I had let the process slip, as i thought after 65 odd days, the matter had disolved (then the crt letter shows up!!!)
            So i thought, bugger this, i dont consent to THIS offer either.
            So i recommenced the process.
            My 1st Notice (Non consent & conditional acceptance) was already in.
            So i went staraight to Step 2 – NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS, NON CONSENT, CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE AND NOTICE TO SHOW CAUSE. Bit different but it felt right to me.
            I gave them (21) days.
            No Reply (remembering that “silience” IS a response)
            Then I did step 3 – DEFAULT NOTICE. Gave them (7) days.
            Time is up this Tuesday 4th April.
            So next will be Step 4 Final Notice – Default Judgement.
            I’m still cratfing this Final Notice – Default Judgement notice together. For me, it just isn’t finishing well, and I’m yet to see what esle should be going into the Notice. See attached.
            Any help would be greatly appreciated.
            Thanks.
            Damian

         2. 

            damianx303 April 2, 2023

            I cant attach my PDF notice for you. Sorry.

4. 

   torus December 13, 2022

   Great stuff. Now let me ask you guys this: When the judge lists the offences and offers a guilty or not-guilty plead, my first approach would have been to ask the judge if I was a man. I would have politely asked him 3 times, and after that I would have asked how this act applies to a man, also 3 times. By second witness principle truth would have been established that there cannot be any guilt involved in that matter. Correct? Would that be the right approach? Thanks.