-
Court Question
Good day,
I have a question in regards to CC debt, if the lawyers ask you about the statements that are sent out to you and this is proof that you used the card and paid on it. How do you respond to that particular question. The CC company sold the debt to another bank, they say in their agreement that they are able to do that and now you are in a new agreement with the new CC company.
I understand that we do not pay on a statement and I did note that all previous payments made to the previous organization were made in error and without full disclosure and I am in possession of new information of which I was not previously made aware of.
I just would like to have a good solid answer back to them when the judge and lawyers pose a question like this to me. I used the card, made payments on the card and now that I sent a letter of validation of claim to the new CC company, they state I am in a new agreement with them.
If the judge states you made purchases on the card, benefited from the card, and paid on the card, how do I respond. I have done so much research and done my due diligence for sure.
However, I am being labeled as an OPCA litigant of course, which seems to be their go to now a days. Just like labeling you as a conspiracy theorist. When you are using their system against them, such a double standards.
I have purchased may modules of Marc’s and have pretty much watched most videos some 4 and 5 times lol, however I have never heard Marc address this particular question. Unless I missed something along the way. Thanks ahead of time if anyone can offer any advice. 😀